[libvirt] Release schedule ... 0.8.0 coming

Okay, since the snapshot API is in I suggest to start the freeze toward the 0.8.0 release. There is still 3 things I think we should look at and allow: 1/ the very large cleanup patch set from Matthias, as this should not break anything (isn't it :-) 2/ the nwfilter IP detection code, it still need a review, I didn't do it, libpcap intimidates me a bit, but I think I can be convinced. 3/ an ESX snapshot support if Matthias (or someone else !) manage to write one in the next days 2/ and 3/ sound fairly contained and about a new functionalitry in this release so the risk of breaking an existing feature is very limited. So hopefully we can ship 0.8.0 by the end of the week-end, now we need testing testing testing :-) Thanks ! Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ daniel@veillard.com | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/

2010/4/5 Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com>:
Okay, since the snapshot API is in I suggest to start the freeze toward the 0.8.0 release. There is still 3 things I think we should look at and allow:
1/ the very large cleanup patch set from Matthias, as this should not break anything (isn't it :-)
Eric has already reviewed most of it, so this should be no problem. But there is this pending question about whether log messages should be translated or not. This affects 2-3 of the 30 patches.
2/ the nwfilter IP detection code, it still need a review, I didn't do it, libpcap intimidates me a bit, but I think I can be convinced. 3/ an ESX snapshot support if Matthias (or someone else !) manage to write one in the next days
I'm currently working on this. It's almost done. Matthias

On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 07:17:28PM +0200, Matthias Bolte wrote:
2010/4/5 Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com>:
Okay, since the snapshot API is in I suggest to start the freeze toward the 0.8.0 release. There is still 3 things I think we should look at and allow:
1/ the very large cleanup patch set from Matthias, as this should not break anything (isn't it :-)
Eric has already reviewed most of it, so this should be no problem. But there is this pending question about whether log messages should be translated or not. This affects 2-3 of the 30 patches.
I would say that the generic answer is no. A log message ends-up in /var/log/message or in a debug file, it's not really an user facing piece of information so there is IMHO no need to translate it (and well we already give a lot of work to translators :-)
2/ the nwfilter IP detection code, it still need a review, I didn't do it, libpcap intimidates me a bit, but I think I can be convinced. 3/ an ESX snapshot support if Matthias (or someone else !) manage to write one in the next days
I'm currently working on this. It's almost done.
Excellent :-) ! Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ daniel@veillard.com | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/

libvir-list-bounces@redhat.com wrote on 04/05/2010 12:48:14 PM:
Please respond to veillard
Okay, since the snapshot API is in I suggest to start the freeze toward the 0.8.0 release. There is still 3 things I think we should look at and allow:
1/ the very large cleanup patch set from Matthias, as this should not break anything (isn't it :-) 2/ the nwfilter IP detection code, it still need a review, I didn't do it, libpcap intimidates me a bit, but I think I can be convinced.
The current code would allow for - explicit IP address declaration by a user for filters requiring the variable 'IP' (*) - detection of the IP address using observation of any kind of traffic. (**) In the future we should extend this to allow users to choose also - DHCP with addresses given from 'any' server - DHCP with addresses given from a specific trusted DHCP server where the user somehow needs to provide the DHCP server address Somehow the user should be able to choose what the method should be, also considering the setup of the VM that may either use static IP configuration or DHCP. With these latter 2 choices added, the user definitely will have to make some conscious decisions and if switching inside the VM from DHCP to static, would have to adapt the method for the next start. VM restore operations are a bit of an issue that I am not sure how to handle, but would want to fall back to (**) for determining the IP address. Any other method that you can think of ? We could *maybe* store the IP address in the domain XML, but it would have to be differentiateable from an IP address that the user originally provided as in (*) above. Cheers! Stefan
3/ an ESX snapshot support if Matthias (or someone else !) manage to write one in the next days
2/ and 3/ sound fairly contained and about a new functionalitry in this release so the risk of breaking an existing feature is very limited.
So hopefully we can ship 0.8.0 by the end of the week-end, now we need testing testing testing :-)
Thanks !
Daniel
-- Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ daniel@veillard.com | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
participants (3)
-
Daniel Veillard
-
Matthias Bolte
-
Stefan Berger