On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 11:32:07PM +0200, Ilias Stamatis wrote:
Signed-off-by: Ilias Stamatis <stamatis.iliass(a)gmail.com>
---
src/test/test_driver.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 82 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/test/test_driver.c b/src/test/test_driver.c
index 74de8f13ad..fa690e2bd6 100755
--- a/src/test/test_driver.c
+++ b/src/test/test_driver.c
@@ -2928,6 +2928,87 @@ testDomainGetMemoryParameters(virDomainPtr dom,
}
+static int
+testDomainSetNumaParameters(virDomainPtr dom,
+ virTypedParameterPtr params,
+ int nparams,
+ unsigned int flags)
+{
+ virDomainObjPtr vm = NULL;
+ virDomainDefPtr def = NULL;
+ virBitmapPtr nodeset = NULL;
+ size_t i;
+ virDomainNumatuneMemMode config_mode;
+ int mode = -1;
+ int ret = -1;
+
+ virCheckFlags(VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_LIVE |
+ VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_CONFIG, -1);
+
+ if (virTypedParamsValidate(params, nparams,
+ VIR_DOMAIN_NUMA_MODE,
+ VIR_TYPED_PARAM_INT,
+ VIR_DOMAIN_NUMA_NODESET,
+ VIR_TYPED_PARAM_STRING,
+ NULL) < 0)
+ return -1;
+
+ if (!(vm = testDomObjFromDomain(dom)))
+ return -1;
+
+ if (!(def = virDomainObjGetOneDef(vm, flags)))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < nparams; i++) {
+ virTypedParameterPtr param = ¶ms[i];
+
+ if (STREQ(param->field, VIR_DOMAIN_NUMA_MODE)) {
+ mode = param->value.i;
+
+ if (mode < 0 || mode >= VIR_DOMAIN_NUMATUNE_MEM_LAST) {
+ virReportError(VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG,
+ _("unsupported numatune mode: '%d'"),
mode);
+ goto cleanup;
+ }
+
+ } else if (STREQ(param->field, VIR_DOMAIN_NUMA_NODESET)) {
+ if (virBitmapParse(param->value.s, &nodeset,
+ VIR_DOMAIN_CPUMASK_LEN) < 0)
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ if (virBitmapIsAllClear(nodeset)) {
+ virReportError(VIR_ERR_OPERATION_INVALID,
+ _("Invalid nodeset of 'numatune':
%s"),
+ param->value.s);
+ goto cleanup;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (virDomainObjIsActive(vm) &&
+ (flags & VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_LIVE) &&
^This doesn't work with VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_CURRENT. You're calling
virDomainObjGetOneDef, in this case you want virDomainObjGetOneDefState which
allows you to pass a boolean ptr which you can then harness here as (dropping
the above 2 lines):
if (live &&
+ mode != -1 &&
+ virDomainNumatuneGetMode(def->numa, -1, &config_mode) == 0 &&
+ config_mode != mode) {
+ virReportError(VIR_ERR_OPERATION_INVALID, "%s",
+ _("can't change numatune mode for running
domain"));
+ goto cleanup;
+ }
+
+ if (virDomainNumatuneSet(def->numa,
+ def->placement_mode ==
+ VIR_DOMAIN_CPU_PLACEMENT_MODE_STATIC,
+ -1, mode, nodeset) < 0)
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ ret = 0;
+ cleanup:
+ virBitmapFree(nodeset);
+ virDomainObjEndAPI(&vm);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+
static int
testDomainGetNumaParameters(virDomainPtr dom,
virTypedParameterPtr params,
@@ -7645,6 +7726,7 @@ static virHypervisorDriver testHypervisorDriver = {
.domainGetMaxVcpus = testDomainGetMaxVcpus, /* 0.7.3 */
.domainGetXMLDesc = testDomainGetXMLDesc, /* 0.1.4 */
.domainGetMemoryParameters = testDomainGetMemoryParameters, /* 5.6.0 */
+ .domainSetNumaParameters = testDomainSetNumaParameters, /* 5.6.0 */
.domainGetNumaParameters = testDomainGetNumaParameters, /* 5.6.0 */
.domainGetInterfaceParameters = testDomainGetInterfaceParameters, /* 5.6.0 */
.connectListDefinedDomains = testConnectListDefinedDomains, /* 0.1.11 */
Normally I'd have fixed the issues and pushed, but patch 2/2 cannot be applied
because it expects a different ancestor rather than 1/2 which means it was
probably created on a different branch not containing 1/2. Rather than forging
patches, could you fix and resend?
To both:
Reviewed-by: Erik Skultety <eskultet(a)redhat.com>