On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 02:13:54PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 11:41:54AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 05:12:20PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
>>When images are on mounted filesystems, there is no guarantee libvirtd
>>will start before they are mounted. In systemd world, this is done
>>with 'After=systemd.mount' in the service file.
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan(a)redhat.com>
>>---
>> daemon/libvirtd.service.in | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>>diff --git a/daemon/libvirtd.service.in b/daemon/libvirtd.service.in
>>index 1759ac8a0946..c461f9462ae5 100644
>>--- a/daemon/libvirtd.service.in
>>+++ b/daemon/libvirtd.service.in
>>@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ After=network.target
>> After=dbus.service
>> After=iscsid.service
>> After=apparmor.service
>>+After=systemd.mount
>
>What is this systemd.mount unit you're referring to ? AFAIK there
>is no such unit - systemd.mount is a man page describing the format
>of *.mount units. Do you instead mean to use local-fs.target which
>blocks until all local filesystems are mounted ?
>
I want this to apply to remote filesystems as well. I thought
systemd.mount covers all activated .mount units, but it wouldn't cover
neither local-fs nor remote-fs targets. So looking at
systemd.special(7) man-page (oh, why is this more complicated then it
must be), I think I must use both After=local-fs.target and
After=remote-fs.target as well.
Yes, after both remote-fs.target & local-fs.target sounds reasonable.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|:
http://berrange.com -o-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|:
http://entangle-photo.org -o-
http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|