2009/12/22 Daniel P. Berrange <berrange(a)redhat.com>:
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 12:15:33PM +0100, Matthias Bolte wrote:
> 2009/12/22 Daniel P. Berrange <berrange(a)redhat.com>:
> > On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 02:12:51AM +0100, Matthias Bolte wrote:
> >> ---
> >> configure.in | 3 ++-
> >> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in
> >> index 3be11f2..81548b8 100644
> >> --- a/configure.in
> >> +++ b/configure.in
> >> @@ -116,7 +116,8 @@ dnl If portablexdr is installed, prefer that.
> >> dnl Otherwise try -lrpc (Cygwin) -lxdr (some MinGW), -lnsl (Solaris)
> >> dnl or none (most Unix)
> >> AC_CHECK_LIB([portablexdr],[xdrmem_create],[],[
> >> - AC_SEARCH_LIBS([xdrmem_create],[rpc xdr nsl])
> >> + AC_SEARCH_LIBS([xdrmem_create],[rpc xdr nsl],[],
> >> + [AC_MSG_ERROR([Cannot find a XDR library])])
> >> ])
> >>
> >> AC_CHECK_LIB([intl],[gettext],[])
> >
> > Hmm, there is no xdr library required on Linux, so we don't want to
> > throw an error in case. Its just part of glibc
> >
>
> When trying to compile libvirt on Windows libportablexdr for example
> is necessary. On Linux I get this output in config log:
>
> configure:41995: checking for xdrmem_create in -lportablexdr
> configure:42030: gcc -o conftest -g -O2 conftest.c -lportablexdr >&5
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lportablexdr
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> [...]
> configure:42069: checking for library containing xdrmem_create
> configure:42110: gcc -o conftest -g -O2 conftest.c >&5
> configure:42117: $? = 0
> configure:42148: result: none required
>
> The first explicit check for libportablexdr fails, but the second test
> succeeds and finds xdrmem_create from glibc.
Ok, so AC_SEARCH_LIBS() is doing a test with no library at all first,
before then trying librpc, libxdr and libnsl in turn. ACK
Daniel
Okay, pushed the 8 patches.
Matthias