On 7/29/21 4:16 AM, Yi Wang wrote: > From: Jia Zhou <zhou.jia2(a)zte.com.cn&gt; > > When loop in function virNVMeDeviceListCreateReAttachList() there may be > reused index @i, this patch fix this by using a new @j. > > Signed-off-by: Jia Zhou <zhou.jia2(a)zte.com.cn&gt; > Signed-off-by: Yi Wang <wang.yi59(a)zte.com.cn&gt; > --- > src/util/virnvme.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/util/virnvme.c b/src/util/virnvme.c > index 49102e3..b54a195 100644 > --- a/src/util/virnvme.c > +++ b/src/util/virnvme.c > @@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ virNVMeDeviceListCreateReAttachList(virNVMeDeviceListPtr activeList, > virNVMeDeviceListPtr toReAttachList) > { > g_autoptr(virPCIDeviceList) pciDevices = NULL; > - size_t i; > + size_t i, j; > > if (!(pciDevices = virPCIDeviceListNew())) > return NULL; > @@ -412,8 +412,8 @@ virNVMeDeviceListCreateReAttachList(virNVMeDeviceListPtr activeList, > /* Check if there is any other NVMe device with the same PCI address as > * @d. To simplify this, let's just count how many NVMe devices with > * the same PCI address there are on the @activeList. */ > - for (i = 0; i < activeList->count; i++) { > - virNVMeDevicePtr other = activeList->devs[i]; > + for (j = 0; j < activeList->count; j++) { > + virNVMeDevicePtr other = activeList->devs[j]; > > if (!virPCIDeviceAddressEqual(&d->address, &other->address)) > continue; > Ooops yes. This is a bug. However, I'd prefer that 'j' would be defined inside the loop. Also, I'm having difficulties applying this patch. Partly because it's multipart e-mail and even if I extract text/plain part then git am is still unhappy. Can you please use git send-email?

Michal