[libvirt PATCH] rpm: convert license to SPDX format
Note that with the introduction of SPDX, Fedora no longer wants maintainers to do effective license analysis, hence we no list all the licenses that are applicable to the binary package contents https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/license-field/#_no_effective_lice... Note, we can still omit licenses that are only applicable to the build system. Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> --- libvirt.spec.in | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/libvirt.spec.in b/libvirt.spec.in index 77b274b6f9..afd0b04f99 100644 --- a/libvirt.spec.in +++ b/libvirt.spec.in @@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ Summary: Library providing a simple virtualization API Name: libvirt Version: @VERSION@ Release: 1%{?dist} -License: LGPLv2+ +License: GPL-2.0-or-later and LGPL-2.1-only and LGPL-2.1-or-later and OFL-1.1 URL: https://libvirt.org/ %if %(echo %{version} | grep -q "\.0$"; echo $?) == 1 -- 2.39.0
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 08:19:28 -0500, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
Note that with the introduction of SPDX, Fedora no longer wants maintainers to do effective license analysis, hence we no list
*we now list
all the licenses that are applicable to the binary package contents
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/license-field/#_no_effective_lice...
In examples in this page ...
Note, we can still omit licenses that are only applicable to the build system.
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> --- libvirt.spec.in | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/libvirt.spec.in b/libvirt.spec.in index 77b274b6f9..afd0b04f99 100644 --- a/libvirt.spec.in +++ b/libvirt.spec.in @@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ Summary: Library providing a simple virtualization API Name: libvirt Version: @VERSION@ Release: 1%{?dist} -License: LGPLv2+ +License: GPL-2.0-or-later and LGPL-2.1-only and LGPL-2.1-or-later and OFL-1.1
... the logical operators are spelled all-caps.
URL: https://libvirt.org/
Reviewed-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 02:30:51PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 08:19:28 -0500, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
Note that with the introduction of SPDX, Fedora no longer wants maintainers to do effective license analysis, hence we no list
*we now list
all the licenses that are applicable to the binary package contents
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/license-field/#_no_effective_lice...
In examples in this page ...
Note, we can still omit licenses that are only applicable to the build system.
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> --- libvirt.spec.in | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/libvirt.spec.in b/libvirt.spec.in index 77b274b6f9..afd0b04f99 100644 --- a/libvirt.spec.in +++ b/libvirt.spec.in @@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ Summary: Library providing a simple virtualization API Name: libvirt Version: @VERSION@ Release: 1%{?dist} -License: LGPLv2+ +License: GPL-2.0-or-later and LGPL-2.1-only and LGPL-2.1-or-later and OFL-1.1
... the logical operators are spelled all-caps.
Yes, that's actually normal practice, so I'll change this.
URL: https://libvirt.org/
Reviewed-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
participants (2)
-
Daniel P. Berrangé -
Peter Krempa