Rather than repeating the conditions in a couple places, extract it into a separate function for detecting whether a domain definition uses UEFI. Signed-off-by: Jonathon Jongsma <jjongsma(a)redhat.com&gt; --- As requested by Andrea, I've extracted this little bit of refactoring from my bochs display patch and am sending it separately. src/qemu/qemu_domain.c | 17 ++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c b/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c index 4998474dc9..ed4b5c666d 100644 --- a/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c @@ -4584,6 +4584,14 @@ qemuDomainValidateCpuCount(const virDomainDef *def, } +static bool +qemuDomainDefIsUEFI(const virDomainDef *def) +{ + return ((def->os.firmware == VIR_DOMAIN_OS_DEF_FIRMWARE_EFI || + (def->os.loader && def->os.loader->type == + VIR_DOMAIN_LOADER_TYPE_PFLASH))); +} + static int qemuDomainDefValidate(const virDomainDef *def, virCapsPtr caps ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED, @@ -4606,10 +4614,7 @@ qemuDomainDefValidate(const virDomainDef *def, } /* On x86, UEFI requires ACPI */ - if ((def->os.firmware == VIR_DOMAIN_OS_DEF_FIRMWARE_EFI || - (def->os.loader && - def->os.loader->type == VIR_DOMAIN_LOADER_TYPE_PFLASH)) && - ARCH_IS_X86(def->os.arch) && + if (qemuDomainDefIsUEFI(def) && ARCH_IS_X86(def->os.arch) && def->features[VIR_DOMAIN_FEATURE_ACPI] != VIR_TRISTATE_SWITCH_ON) { virReportError(VIR_ERR_CONFIG_UNSUPPORTED, "%s", _("UEFI requires ACPI on this architecture")); @@ -4619,9 +4624,7 @@ qemuDomainDefValidate(const virDomainDef *def, /* On aarch64, ACPI requires UEFI */ if (def->features[VIR_DOMAIN_FEATURE_ACPI] == VIR_TRISTATE_SWITCH_ON && def->os.arch == VIR_ARCH_AARCH64 && - (def->os.firmware != VIR_DOMAIN_OS_DEF_FIRMWARE_EFI && - (!def->os.loader || - def->os.loader->type != VIR_DOMAIN_LOADER_TYPE_PFLASH))) { + !qemuDomainDefIsUEFI(def)) { virReportError(VIR_ERR_CONFIG_UNSUPPORTED, "%s", _("ACPI requires UEFI on this architecture")); goto cleanup; -- 2.21.0