While running qemucaps2xmltest, it was found that valgrind pointed out the following memory leaks: ==29896== 0 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1 of 65 ==29896== at 0x4A0577B: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:593) ==29896== by 0x4C6B45E: virAllocN (viralloc.c:191) ==29896== by 0x4232A9: virQEMUCapsGetMachineTypesCaps (qemu_capabilities.c:1999) ==29896== by 0x4234E7: virQEMUCapsInitGuestFromBinary (qemu_capabilities.c:789) ==29896== by 0x41F10B: testQemuCapsXML (qemucaps2xmltest.c:118) ==29896== by 0x41FFD1: virtTestRun (testutils.c:201) ==29896== by 0x41EE7A: mymain (qemucaps2xmltest.c:203) ==29896== by 0x42074D: virtTestMain (testutils.c:789) ==29896== by 0x3E6CE1ED1C: (below main) (libc-start.c:226) ==29896== ==29896== 0 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 2 of 65 ==29896== at 0x4A0577B: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:593) ==29896== by 0x4C6B45E: virAllocN (viralloc.c:191) ==29896== by 0x4232A9: virQEMUCapsGetMachineTypesCaps (qemu_capabilities.c:1999) ==29896== by 0x4234E7: virQEMUCapsInitGuestFromBinary (qemu_capabilities.c:789) ==29896== by 0x41F10B: testQemuCapsXML (qemucaps2xmltest.c:118) ==29896== by 0x41FFD1: virtTestRun (testutils.c:201) ==29896== by 0x41EEA3: mymain (qemucaps2xmltest.c:204) ==29896== by 0x42074D: virtTestMain (testutils.c:789) ==29896== by 0x3E6CE1ED1C: (below main) (libc-start.c:226) --- src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c | 4 ++++ 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c b/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c index 7673592..aef8bc1 100644 --- a/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c @@ -789,6 +789,10 @@ virQEMUCapsInitGuestFromBinary(virCapsPtr caps, if (virQEMUCapsGetMachineTypesCaps(qemubinCaps, &nmachines, &machines) < 0) goto cleanup; + /* Free unneeded memory given by malloc(0) */ + if (!nmachines) + VIR_FREE(machines); + /* We register kvm as the base emulator too, since we can * just give -no-kvm to disable acceleration if required */ if ((guest = virCapabilitiesAddGuest(caps,