On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 08:27:07AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 04/14/2010 03:10 PM, Stefan Berger wrote:
> To avoid race-conditions, the tear down of a filter has to happen before
> the tap interface disappears and another tap interface with the same
> name can re-appear. This patch tries to fix this. In one place, where
> communication with the qemu monitor may fail, I am only tearing the
> filters down after knowing that the function did not fail.
>
> I am also moving the tear down functions into an include file for other
> drivers to reuse.
ACK.
ACK too,
> +static inline void
> +virNWFilterTearVMNWFilters(virDomainObjPtr vm) {
> + int i;
> + for (i = 0; i < vm->def->nnets; i++)
Is it worth using C99 syntax, to condense two lines to one?
for (int i = 0; ...
But that's a general question, and should not hold up your patch.
so far we never did it in the code, so for consistency I would avoid
that, I also like to have an empty line after variable(s) declarations.
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit
http://xmlsoft.org/
daniel(a)veillard.com | Rpmfind RPM search engine
http://rpmfind.net/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library
http://libvirt.org/