Problem: Has anyone thought about a mechanism to limit/remove an access to a device during an application runtime? Meaning we have an application that has an open file descriptor to some /dev/node and depending on *something* it gains or looses the access to it gracefully (with or without a notification, but without any fatal consequences). Example: LXC. Imagine we have 2 separate containers. Both running full operating systems. Specifically with 2 X servers. Both running concurrently of course. Both need the same input devices (e.g. we have just one mouse). This creates a security problem when we want to have completely separate environments. One container is active (being displayed on a monitor and controlled with a mouse) while the other container runs evtest /dev/input/something and grabs the secret password user typed in the other. Solutions: The complete solution would comprise of 2 parts: - a mechanism that would allow to temporally "hide" a device from an open file descriptor. - a mechanism for deciding whether application/process/namespace should have an access to a specific device at a specific moment Let's focus on the first problem only, as it would need to be solved first anyway. I haven't found anything that would allow me to do it. There are a lot mechanisms that make it possible to restrict an access during open(): - DAC - ACL (controlled by hand or with uaccess) - LSM (in general) - device cgroups But all of those can't do a thing when the device is already opened and an application has a file descriptor. I don't see such mechanism in kernel sources either. I do imagine that it would not be possible for every device to handle such a thing (dri comes to mind) without breaking something (graphics card state in dri example). But there is class of simple input/output devices that would handle this without problems. I did implement some proof-of-concept solution for an evdev driver by allowing or disallowing events that go to evdev_client structure using some arbitrary condition. But this is far from a generic solution. My proof-of-concept is somewhat similar to this (I just found it): http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-input/msg25547.html Though a little bit wider in scope. But neither is flawless nor generic. Has anyone had any thoughts about a similar problem? -- Regards Havner