I see no reason to duplicate this list of architectures. This also allows more guest architectures to be used with libvirt (like the mips64el qemu machine I am trying to run). Signed-off-by: James Cowgill <james410(a)cowgill.org.uk&gt; --- docs/schemas/domaincommon.rng | 26 ++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/schemas/domaincommon.rng b/docs/schemas/domaincommon.rng index 7c6fa5c..fc28fb3 100644 --- a/docs/schemas/domaincommon.rng +++ b/docs/schemas/domaincommon.rng @@ -331,7 +331,9 @@ <define name="ostypehvm"> <element name="type"> <optional> - <ref name="archList"/> + <attribute name="arch"> + <ref name="archnames"/> + </attribute> </optional> <optional> <attribute name="machine"> @@ -344,29 +346,13 @@ </element> </define> - <define name="archList"> - <attribute name="arch"> - <choice> - <value>armv7l</value> - <value>aarch64</value> - <value>i686</value> - <value>x86_64</value> - <value>mips</value> - <value>ppc</value> - <value>ppc64</value> - <value>ppc64le</value> - <value>s390</value> - <value>s390x</value> - <value>sparc</value> - </choice> - </attribute> - </define> - <define name="osexe"> <element name="os"> <element name="type"> <optional> - <ref name="archList"/> + <attribute name="arch"> + <ref name="archnames"/> + </attribute> </optional> <value>exe</value> </element>