[libvirt] libvirt for rhel-5?
hi, is there any plan to be able to buils libvirt on rhel-5 ie. epel-5? currently all virt and kvm releated packages can be build on epel except libvirt since this dbus problem. thanks in advance. -------------------------------------- gcc -I../gnulib/lib -I../gnulib/lib -I../include -I../include -I../src -I/usr/include/libxml2 -Wall -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Wpointer-arith -Wextra -Wshadow -Wcast-align -Wwrite-strings -Waggregate-return -Wstrict-prototypes -Winline -Wredundant-decls -Wno-sign-compare -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -DLOCAL_STATE_DIR=\"/var\" -DSYSCONF_DIR=\"/etc\" -DQEMUD_PID_FILE=\"\" -DREMOTE_PID_FILE=\"/var/run/libvirtd.pid\" -DGETTEXT_PACKAGE=\"libvirt\" -D_REENTRANT -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -Wall -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Wpointer-arith -Wextra -Wshadow -Wcast-align -Wwrite-strings -Waggregate-return -Wstrict-prototypes -Winline -Wredundant-decls -Wno-sign-compare -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -o .libs/libvirtd libvirtd-event.o libvirtd-qemud.o libvirtd-remote.o libvirtd-remote_protocol.o libvirtd-mdns.o ../gnulib/lib/.libs/libgnu.a ../src/.libs/libvirt_driver_qemu.a ../src/.libs/libvirt_driver_lxc.a ../src/.libs/libvirt_driver_uml.a ../src/.libs/libvirt_driver_storage.a ../src/.libs/libvirt_driver_network.a ../src/.libs/libvirt_driver_nodedev.a -L/lib64 -lhal -ldbus-1 ../src/.libs/libvirt.so -lxml2 -lz -lm -lselinux -lgnutls -lsasl2 -lxenstore -lavahi-common -lavahi-client -lpthread ../src/.libs/libvirt_driver_nodedev.a(libvirt_driver_nodedev_la-node_device_hal.o): In function `add_dbus_watch': /home/robot/rpm/BUILD/libvirt-0.5.1/src/node_device_hal.c:578: undefined reference to `dbus_watch_get_unix_fd' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [libvirtd] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/robot/rpm/BUILD/libvirt-0.5.1/qemud' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/robot/rpm/BUILD/libvirt-0.5.1' make: *** [all] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.39202 (%build) -------------------------------------- -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 01:00:49AM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
hi, is there any plan to be able to buils libvirt on rhel-5 ie. epel-5? currently all virt and kvm releated packages can be build on epel except libvirt since this dbus problem.
This is already fixed in CVS. http://libvirt.org/hg/libvirt-mirror/diff/9e940abe32a1/src/node_device_hal.c Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 01:00:49AM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
hi, is there any plan to be able to buils libvirt on rhel-5 ie. epel-5? currently all virt and kvm releated packages can be build on epel except libvirt since this dbus problem.
This is already fixed in CVS.
http://libvirt.org/hg/libvirt-mirror/diff/9e940abe32a1/src/node_device_hal.c
thanks. will be there a newer release 0.5.2 (and may be a rawhide src.rpm too) in the near future or it's better to patch 0.5.1? -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:17:40PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 01:00:49AM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
hi, is there any plan to be able to buils libvirt on rhel-5 ie. epel-5? currently all virt and kvm releated packages can be build on epel except libvirt since this dbus problem.
This is already fixed in CVS.
http://libvirt.org/hg/libvirt-mirror/diff/9e940abe32a1/src/node_device_hal.c
thanks. will be there a newer release 0.5.2 (and may be a rawhide src.rpm too) in the near future or it's better to patch 0.5.1?
The next update will be 0.6.0, hopefully sometime in the next week. NB, if you're re-packaging libvirt for EPEL-5, be warned that none of the previous upstream releases fully work with RHEL-5 Xen because they are not aware of some significant backported features. In the 0.6.0 release you should make sure you run configure using --with-rhel5-api=yes command line arg to fully support RHEL-5 Xen. Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:
NB, if you're re-packaging libvirt for EPEL-5, be warned that none of
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/FAQ#Does_EPEL_replace_packages_provided_w... libvirt cannot be in EPEL-5 since it's in baseOS
Alan Pevec wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:
NB, if you're re-packaging libvirt for EPEL-5, be warned that none of
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/FAQ#Does_EPEL_replace_packages_provided_w...
libvirt cannot be in EPEL-5 since it's in baseOS
no, i'd like to add to my onw repo and may be later to centos's extras repo. the current rhel-5 kvm support is simple unusable:-( you can only use xen in that case. and unfortunately as rhel don't want updat their kernel in rhel-5 kvm support never will really good. -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 01:00:25PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
Alan Pevec wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:
NB, if you're re-packaging libvirt for EPEL-5, be warned that none of
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/FAQ#Does_EPEL_replace_packages_provided_w...
libvirt cannot be in EPEL-5 since it's in baseOS
no, i'd like to add to my onw repo and may be later to centos's extras repo. the current rhel-5 kvm support is simple unusable:-( you can only use xen in that case. and unfortunately as rhel don't want updat their kernel in rhel-5 kvm support never will really good.
To clarify there is *NO* RHEL-5 KVM support at all. It is not part of RHEL-5. So it say it is unusable is to criticise something which does not exist. Any KVM support found in RHEL-5 is something added by a 3rd party. Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|
participants (3)
-
Alan Pevec -
Daniel P. Berrange -
Farkas Levente