[libvirt] [PATCH v2] spec: Fix minor changelog issues
When a changelog entry references an RPM macro, % needs to be escaped so that it does not appear expanded in package changelog. Fri Mar 4 2009 is incorrect since Mar 4 was Wednesday. Since libvirt-0.6.1 was released on Mar 4 2009, we should change Fri to Wed. --- libvirt.spec.in | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/libvirt.spec.in b/libvirt.spec.in index 8df908d..c2da6ec 100644 --- a/libvirt.spec.in +++ b/libvirt.spec.in @@ -2309,7 +2309,7 @@ fi * Fri Apr 3 2009 Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com> - 0.6.2-1 - release of 0.6.2 -* Fri Mar 4 2009 Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com> - 0.6.1-1 +* Wed Mar 4 2009 Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com> - 0.6.1-1 - release of 0.6.1 * Sat Jan 31 2009 Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com> - 0.6.0-1 @@ -2448,7 +2448,7 @@ fi - it's pkgconfig not pgkconfig ! * Mon Nov 6 2006 Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com> 0.1.8-2 -- fixing spec file, added %dist, -devel requires pkgconfig and xen-devel +- fixing spec file, added %%dist, -devel requires pkgconfig and xen-devel - Resolves: rhbz#202320 * Mon Oct 16 2006 Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com> 0.1.8-1 -- 1.8.1.2
On 02/01/2013 05:53 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
When a changelog entry references an RPM macro, % needs to be escaped so that it does not appear expanded in package changelog.
Fri Mar 4 2009 is incorrect since Mar 4 was Wednesday. Since libvirt-0.6.1 was released on Mar 4 2009, we should change Fri to Wed. --- libvirt.spec.in | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
ACK. (Wonder what RPM lint tool let you notice the bogus date?) -- Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 10:06:28AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
On 02/01/2013 05:53 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
When a changelog entry references an RPM macro, % needs to be escaped so that it does not appear expanded in package changelog.
Fri Mar 4 2009 is incorrect since Mar 4 was Wednesday. Since libvirt-0.6.1 was released on Mar 4 2009, we should change Fri to Wed. --- libvirt.spec.in | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
ACK. (Wonder what RPM lint tool let you notice the bogus date?)
IIUC, rpmbuild itself just recently started complaining about this during builds. Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 10:06:28 -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
On 02/01/2013 05:53 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
When a changelog entry references an RPM macro, % needs to be escaped so that it does not appear expanded in package changelog.
Fri Mar 4 2009 is incorrect since Mar 4 was Wednesday. Since libvirt-0.6.1 was released on Mar 4 2009, we should change Fri to Wed. --- libvirt.spec.in | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
ACK. (Wonder what RPM lint tool let you notice the bogus date?)
It was rpmdiff. Thanks and pushed. Jirka
participants (3)
-
Daniel P. Berrange -
Eric Blake -
Jiri Denemark