On 07/21/2015 12:50 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 12:12:03PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
> On 07/17/2015 10:15 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 02:44:59PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
>>> As of fedora polkit-0.113-2, polkit-devel only pulls in polkit-libs, not
>>> full polkit, but we need the latter for pkcheck otherwise our configure
>>> test fails.
>>> ---
>>> libvirt.spec.in | 2 ++
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/libvirt.spec.in b/libvirt.spec.in
>>> index 0adf55e..40d2ccb 100644
>>> --- a/libvirt.spec.in
>>> +++ b/libvirt.spec.in
>>> @@ -531,6 +531,8 @@ BuildRequires: cyrus-sasl-devel
>>> %endif
>>> %if %{with_polkit}
>>> %if 0%{?fedora} >= 20 || 0%{?rhel} >= 7
>>> +# F22 polkit-devel doesn't pull in polkit anymore, which we need for
pkcheck
>>> +BuildRequires: polkit >= 0.112
>>> BuildRequires: polkit-devel >= 0.112
>>> %else
>>> %if 0%{?fedora} || 0%{?rhel} >= 6
>>
>> NACK.
>>
>> We don't actually use pkcheck anymore, since we switched to using
>> dbus API calls. So we should kill the binary check in configure.ac
>> instead.
>>
>
> My autotools-fu is weak and I can't really spare time for this at the moment,
> so I'd appreciate it if someone else could pick it up
Ok, I've looked at this and due to the way we detect polkit-0 and prefer
polkit-1 when both are installed, we need to keep the check for pkcheck.
So on that basis ACK to your original patch.
I'll also send a followup to clarify this rationale in configure.ac.
Sounds good, I pushed this patch now
- Cole