On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 06:17:05PM +0200, Peter Krempa wrote: > Add a new modifier letter for virJSONValueObjectAddVArgs which will add > a boolean value with our tristate semantics. The value is omitted when > the _ABSENT value is used. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa(a)redhat.com&gt; > --- > src/util/virjson.c | 13 +++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/src/util/virjson.c b/src/util/virjson.c > index 29530dcb15..e45f1fab06 100644 > --- a/src/util/virjson.c > +++ b/src/util/virjson.c > @@ -142,6 +142,8 @@ virJSONValueGetType(const virJSONValue *value) > * > * b: boolean value > * B: boolean value, omitted if false > + * T: boolean value specified by a virTristate(Bool|Switch) value, omitted on > + * the _ABSENT value > * > * d: double precision floating point number > * n: json null value > @@ -266,12 +268,23 @@ virJSONValueObjectAddVArgs(virJSONValuePtr obj, > } break; > > case 'B': > + case 'T': > case 'b': { > int val = va_arg(args, int); > > if (!val && type == 'B') > continue; > > + if (type == 'T') { > + if (val == VIR_TRISTATE_SWITCH_ABSENT) Just curious, was ^this on purpose to emphasize the fact that it would really work with TristateSwitch since both _ABSENTs == 0 or just a coincidence? I'd probably prefer _SWITCH_ABSENT slightly more to be consistent with the enum being tested below.

Reviewed-by: Erik Skultety <eskultet(a)redhat.com&gt; > + continue; > + > + if (val == VIR_TRISTATE_BOOL_NO) > + val = 0; > + else > + val = 1; > + } > + > rc = virJSONValueObjectAppendBoolean(obj, key, val); > } break; > > -- > 2.16.2 > > -- > libvir-list mailing list > libvir-list(a)redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list