On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 16:12 -0500, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 12:33:24PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Daniel Veillard wrote:
Yeah my first reaction was to provide XML based configuration files that libvir would be able to understand, but I really think the configurations may come from very varied sources possibly databases. That's why I would rather have the library agnostic when it comes to what a configuration may look like.
I'll have to think about this one. My biggest fear is that if there are a bunch of management tools capable of creating domains you'll end up with a bunch of different places storing configs.
I expect my QA engineers and the developpers to store their configs in different places on the test cluster :-) you really expect people to use a unified storage ? I didn't expect it myself.
There should be (at least) suggested and by distributions supported way how to share domain configurations between more tools. I think we can support both -- unified storage (/etc/something) and API that allows to use customized storages (e.g. databases). Karel -- Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>