On 05/30/2012 10:59 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On 05/30/2012 05:50 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 05/30/2012 09:35 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
>> Apart from the non-sanlock check build, there is also a little fix for
>> qemu (EXTRA_DIST had qemu.conf and others inside even if the build was
>> supposed to be without qemu).
>> ---
Thanks, ACK'd hunks are pushed, the NACK'd one was just my
misunderstanding, it doesn't do anything wrong.
However, I didn't change the commit message, so it maybe a little
confusing and I realized it after the push. What's the best way to solve
that?
Oh well. It's not worth rewinding history just to change a bad commit
message, and this isn't the first time a commit message is a bit out of
date with the actual contents of the change. We'll just have to live
with it :)
--
Eric Blake eblake(a)redhat.com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library
http://libvirt.org