Re: [libvirt] Question about PHP licencing for libvirt-php (php-libvirt for Fedora)

On 03/10/2011 07:12 PM, Michal Novotny wrote: > Well, I agree that LGPLv2+ license would be better. We need to wait > for Lyre's and Radek's reply then. I agree with Radek: > I prefer to use license that will allow widespread use of the project and ensure that if someone needs some additional function he/she will add them and share with others. Since I don't understand those license well, I also don't mind if you guys change it to the suitable one.

So we avoid the PHP license for our code then. Here's what we do - Our code is licensed LGPLv2+ - Project is named/described 'libvirt bindings for PHP' - RPM / tar.gz is named php-libvirt (this is in fact required by Fedora RPM guidelines for php extensions)