Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com> writes:
diff --git a/src/conf/domain_conf.c b/src/conf/domain_conf.c index 6313d30..5c1b1de 100644 --- a/src/conf/domain_conf.c +++ b/src/conf/domain_conf.c @@ -10272,6 +10272,7 @@ virDomainVideoDefParseXML(xmlNodePtr node, char *heads = NULL; char *vram = NULL; char *ram = NULL; + char *vgamem = NULL; char *primary = NULL;
if (VIR_ALLOC(def) < 0) @@ -10285,6 +10286,7 @@ virDomainVideoDefParseXML(xmlNodePtr node, type = virXMLPropString(cur, "type"); ram = virXMLPropString(cur, "ram"); vram = virXMLPropString(cur, "vram"); + vgamem = virXMLPropString(cur, "vgamem"); heads = virXMLPropString(cur, "heads");
if ((primary = virXMLPropString(cur, "primary")) != NULL) { @@ -10338,6 +10340,19 @@ virDomainVideoDefParseXML(xmlNodePtr node, def->vram = virDomainVideoDefaultRAM(dom, def->type); }
+ if (vgamem) { + if (def->type != VIR_DOMAIN_VIDEO_TYPE_QXL) { + virReportError(VIR_ERR_XML_ERROR, "%s", + _("vgamem attribute only supported for type of qxl")); + goto error;
Should libvirt ignore XML attributes that makes no sense for some models and keep accepting a configuration that used to work before? (I am replying to this old post, just because it caused a regression in virt-manager) Thanks, Giuseppe