Re: [libvirt] RFC: dhcp <option> element revisited
Am 14.03.2013 20:36, schrieb Laine Stump:
After 9 days and no replies (except a short conversation with DV on
IRC), I guess it's time to take some good ol' 'Murican unilateral action :-)
Sorry, I didn't have time to come back to this topic earlier, although I
actually ACKed your idea on IRC, too ;)
[A lot of good ideas left out]
d) I think we do need a whitelist, and we should minimally populate it
to begin with, using a table as I described in the earlier mail:
> uint8 code;
> const char *name; /* could be "", in which case we don't recognize
a
> name for it */
> unsigned int flags; /* whether or not multiple values are allowed,
> name recognized by dnsmasq */
> /* some representation of type here */
Yes, but as dnsmasq doesn't have names for the private space (options
224 - 254) please also add names for these as well. This should probably
go along with a patch to Simon for inclusion of the same names in
dnsmasq as well.
--
Pieter Hollants <pieter(a)hollants.com>