Am 14.03.2013 20:36, schrieb Laine Stump:
After 9 days and no replies (except a short conversation with DV on IRC), I guess it's time to take some good ol' 'Murican unilateral action :-)
Sorry, I didn't have time to come back to this topic earlier, although I actually ACKed your idea on IRC, too ;) [A lot of good ideas left out]
d) I think we do need a whitelist, and we should minimally populate it to begin with, using a table as I described in the earlier mail:
uint8 code; const char *name; /* could be "", in which case we don't recognize a name for it */ unsigned int flags; /* whether or not multiple values are allowed, name recognized by dnsmasq */ /* some representation of type here */
Yes, but as dnsmasq doesn't have names for the private space (options 224 - 254) please also add names for these as well. This should probably go along with a patch to Simon for inclusion of the same names in dnsmasq as well. -- Pieter Hollants <pieter@hollants.com>