On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 11:57:33PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599091
Saving a paused 512MB domain took 3m47s with the old block size of 512 bytes. Changing the block size to 1024*1024 decreased the time to 56 seconds. (Doubling again to 2048*1024 yielded 0 improvement; lowering to 512k increased the save time to 1m10s, about 20%)
Surely we should have gone for 1024*1024 in this case ? NB, since our XML header gets rounded up to a multiple of the block size, smaller is better, because we're filling the disk with zeros here :-)
--- src/qemu/qemu_monitor.h | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_monitor.h b/src/qemu/qemu_monitor.h index 1870b22..fd39b1c 100644 --- a/src/qemu/qemu_monitor.h +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_monitor.h @@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ int qemuMonitorMigrateToCommand(qemuMonitorPtr mon, unsigned int background, const char * const *argv);
-# define QEMU_MONITOR_MIGRATE_TO_FILE_BS 512llu +# define QEMU_MONITOR_MIGRATE_TO_FILE_BS (1024llu * 2048)
int qemuMonitorMigrateToFile(qemuMonitorPtr mon, unsigned int background, --
Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://deltacloud.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|