On 04/05/2010 05:05 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 04/05/2010 11:37 AM, Chris Lalancette wrote:
> +=item B<snapshot-create> I<domain> I<xmlfile>
> +
> +Create a snapshot for domain I<domain> with the properties specified in
> +I<xmlfile>. The only properties settable for a domain snapshot are the
> +<name> and <description>; the rest of the fields are ignored, and
> +automatically filled in by libvirt. If I<xmlfile> is completely ommitted,
s/ommitted/omitted/
/me blushes. I should know better.
> +=item B<revert-to-snapshot> I<domain> I<snapshot>
> +
> +Revert the given domain to the snapshot specified by I<snapshot>. Be aware
> +that this is a destructive action; any changes in the domain since the
> +snapshot is taken will be lost. Also note that the state of the domain after
I think it reads better to use s/snapshot is taken/snapshot was taken/,
since the snapshot was created in the past compared to the current state
of the domain that we are discarding.
Yep, agreed. I re-worded that a few times and didn't fix up all of my grammar.
ACK, with those nits addressed.
Thanks, I've pushed with those nits fixed.
--
Chris Lalancette