Am 07.08.2012 18:49, schrieb Eric Blake:
On 08/07/2012 09:58 AM, Corey Bryant wrote:
> This patch adds support that enables passing of file descriptors
> to the QEMU monitor where they will be stored in specified file
> descriptor sets.
>
> A file descriptor set can be used by a client like libvirt to
> store file descriptors for the same file. This allows the
> client to open a file with different access modes (O_RDWR,
> O_WRONLY, O_RDONLY) and add/remove the passed fds to/from an fd
> set as needed. This will allow QEMU to (in a later patch in this
> series) "open" and "reopen" the same file by dup()ing the fd in
> the fd set that corresponds to the file, where the fd has the
> matching access mode flag that QEMU requests.
>
> The new QMP commands are:
> add-fd: Add a file descriptor to an fd set
> remove-fd: Remove a file descriptor from an fd set
> query-fdsets: Return information describing all fd sets
>
> +
> +# @AddfdInfo:
> +#
> +# Information about a file descriptor that was added to an fd set.
> +#
> +# @fdset_id: The ID of the fd set that @fd was added to.
> +#
> +# @fd: The file descriptor that was received via SCM rights and
> +# added to the fd set.
> +#
> +# Since: 1.2.0
We're not very consistent on '1.2' vs. '1.2.0' in since listings,
but
that's probably worth a global cleanup closer to hard freeze.
> +##
> +{ 'type': 'AddfdInfo', 'data': {'fdset_id':
'int', 'fd': 'int'} }
This is a new command, so s/fdset_id/fdset-id/
> +
> +##
> +# @add-fd:
> +#
> +# Add a file descriptor, that was passed via SCM rights, to an fd set.
> +#
> +# @fdset_id: #optional The ID of the fd set to add the file descriptor to.
> +#
> +# Returns: @AddfdInfo on success
> +# If file descriptor was not received, FdNotSupplied
> +# If @fdset_id does not exist, FdSetNotFound
> +#
> +# Notes: The list of fd sets is shared by all monitor connections.
> +#
> +# If @fdset_id is not specified, a new fd set will be created.
> +#
> +# Since: 1.2.0
> +##
> +{ 'command': 'add-fd', 'data': {'*fdset_id':
'int'},
Again, s/fdset_id/fdset-id/
> + 'returns': 'AddfdInfo' }
> +
> +##
> +# @remove-fd:
> +#
> +# Remove a file descriptor from an fd set.
> +#
> +# @fdset_id: The ID of the fd set that the file descriptor belongs to.
> +#
> +# @fd: #optional The file descriptor that is to be removed.
> +#
> +# Returns: Nothing on success
> +# If @fdset_id or @fd is not found, FdNotFound
> +#
> +# Since: 1.2.0
> +#
> +# Notes: The list of fd sets is shared by all monitor connections.
> +#
> +# File descriptors that are removed:
> +# o will not be closed until the reference count corresponding
> +# to @fdset_id reaches zero.
> +# o will not be available for use after successful completion
> +# of the remove-fd command.
> +#
> +# If @fd is not specified, all file descriptors in @fdset_id
> +# will be removed.
> +##
> +{ 'command': 'remove-fd', 'data': {'fdset_id':
'int', '*fd': 'int'} }
And again.
> +
> +##
> +# @FdsetFdInfo:
> +#
> +# Information about a file descriptor that belongs to an fd set.
> +#
> +# @fd: The file descriptor value.
> +#
> +# @removed: If true, the remove-fd command has been issued for this fd.
> +#
> +# Since: 1.2.0
> +##
> +{ 'type': 'FdsetFdInfo', 'data': {'fd':
'int', 'removed': 'bool'} }
Is it worth providing any additional information? For example, knowing
whether the fd is O_RDONLY, O_WRONLY, or O_RDWR might be beneficial to
management apps trying to discover what fds are already present after a
reconnection, in order to decide whether to close them without having to
resort to /proc/$qemupid/fdinfo/nnn lookups. It might even be worth
marking such information optional, present only when 'removed':false.
Why do we even include removed=true file descriptors in query-fdsets?
Shouldn't they appear to be, well, removed from a clients POV?
The problem with adding flags is the same as with errno numbers: How to
do it in a platform independent way? The management application might
run on a different OS than qemu, so a numeric 'flags' field could have
an entirely different meaning there.
We could add bools for some flags and an enum for
O_RDONLY/O_WRONLY/O_RDWR, but it's probably better to wait until we know
which of them we really need.
Kevin