On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 10:21:14AM -1000, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 2/27/23 10:12, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 11:50:07AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > I feel like we should have separate deprecation entries for the
> > i686 host support, and for qemu-system-i386 emulator binary, as
> > although they're related they are independant features with
> > differing impact. eg removing qemu-system-i386 affects all
> > host architectures, not merely 32-bit x86 host, so I think we
> > can explain the impact more clearly if we separate them.
>
> Removing qemu-system-i386 seems ok to me - I think qemu-system-x86_64 is
> a superset.
>
> Removing support for building on 32 bit systems seems like a pity - it's
> one of a small number of ways to run 64 bit binaries on 32 bit systems,
> and the maintainance overhead is quite small.
It's not that small. It only works for single-threaded system mode. It
silently does not honor atomicity for user-only mode, which is perhaps worse
not working at all.
We should probably block multi-threading on 32 bit then.
--
MST