On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 12:34:05PM -0700, Ian Main wrote:
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:56:21 +0200
Daniel Veillard <veillard(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 10:55:36AM -0700, Ian Main wrote:
> I'm a little bit worried by the following:
>
> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
> 9758 qpidd 20 0 273m 137m 1644 S 46.6 6.8 986:30.29 qpidd
>
> that's with just 3 nodes over a week with no traffic except the
> keeping the machines on the bus, the memory footprint of qpidd
> seems to be growing, very slowly but nonetheless continuously, and
> that's just with 3 nodes hooked with libvirt-qpid.
> is that a genuine leak in qpidd ? (qpidd-0.3.700546-1.fc9.x86_64)
> is that related to the policy to keep messages sent to the QPid bus ?
>
> I wonder. It also consumes some non-neglective amount of CPU as
> a background task.
I talked to the qpid folks about this today. It's a bug one way or another.
They fixed one that may be causing this and there will be new RPMs out
hopefully today. If that doesn't do it it may have something to do with
how QMF is doing things. If you still see this after the RPM upgrade
let me know. I'll be trying it out too. Thanks!
Okay, I will keep an eye, thanks for the info !
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit
http://xmlsoft.org/
daniel(a)veillard.com | Rpmfind RPM search engine
http://rpmfind.net/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library
http://libvirt.org/