On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 05:03:14PM -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote:
In an attempt to rename a kvm vm (which was powered off) I performed
the following:
$ virsh edit old-name
Then changed <name>old-name</name> to <name>new-name</name> and
saved
and quit from the editor.
$ virsh list --all
Id Name State
----------------------------------
- old-name shut off
- new-name shut off
Performing an edit on each of these shows they're completely
identical. Even the <name> section shows the old-name on both of them.
If the action I did is truly invalid, we should catch that an error
out on it. However I think VM renaming can be a valid use case and we
have the UUID to match off of for the rename. Basically, I'm
contacting the list to see if my use case was invalid and I should
write my patch to spit an error, or if I should write my patch to
correct the improper handling. Patch to follow based on responses.
What libvirt version have you got ? We recently added a patch to
explicitly refuse this scenario of sanme UUID, but different names
/* See if a VM with matching UUID already exists */
vm = virDomainFindByUUID(&driver->domains, def->uuid);
if (vm) {
/* UUID matches, but if names don't match, refuse it */
if (STRNEQ(vm->def->name, def->name)) {
char uuidstr[VIR_UUID_STRING_BUFLEN];
virUUIDFormat(vm->def->uuid, uuidstr);
qemudReportError(conn, NULL, NULL, VIR_ERR_OPERATION_FAILED,
_("domain '%s' is already defined with uuid
%s"),
vm->def->name, uuidstr);
goto cleanup;
}
...
It also refuses case of different UUIDs, but same names.
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o-
http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org -o-
http://ovirt.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|