On 10/7/2010 5:13 AM, Justin Clift wrote:
On 10/07/2010 10:17 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 12:04:11AM +0530, Harsh Prateek Bora wrote:
>> This patch introduces new attribute to filesystem element
>> to support customizable security_model for mount type.
>> Valid security_model are: passthrough, mapped and none.
>>
>> Usage:
>> <filesystem type='mount' security_model='passthrough'>
>
> I'd like to think of a different name for this, because
> 'security_model' is already used in libvirt in the context
> of sVirt and I think it'd be better to avoid the same
> terminology. I've not got any ideas just yet, but I'll
> think of some....
"mount_security"
"mount_security_type"
"mount_security_mode" ("mode" sounds too similar to "model"
tho maybe)
Actually all three sound good.. mount_security is good enough if no objections.
- JV
?