Re: [PATCH] rpm: Fix handling of SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH

On 10/27/20 1:06 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 6:24 AM Michal Privoznik <mprivozn(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> >> On 10/26/20 11:08 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: >>> Contemporary versions of Fedora automatically set SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH >>> based on the changelog entry date stamp. In scenarios where it already >>> is defined, we do not want to redefine it. >>> >> >> This part is okay. >> >>> Additionally, when building the libvirt package in an Open Build Service >>> instance, the spec file is not present in %_specdir, but instead in %_sourcedir. >>> >> >> But this looks fishy. Is the %_specdir defined in that case? >> > > It is (that comes from RPM itself), however the directory is empty. That feels like a bug in OBS then. IIUC this macro can be specified on the rpmbuild's cmd line. Can't it set the %_specdir to be the same as %_sourcedir?