Hi all,

This email content might be duplicated with other thread posted in other
places that I do not know yet where to find or search (please let me know
if it is true). I am working on a small bug of virsh domxml-to-native. 
Before I made any changes to the code in order to fix the bug, I 'make
 test'-ed and 'valgrind test'-ed the code, encountered four failures in 
'make test' and 19 failures in 'make -C tests valgrind'. What I did today 
was the following:

git checkout master
git pull
./autogen.sh --prefix=$(pwd)/build
make
make install
# So far so good, no errors ; however

make check VIR_TEST_EXPENSIVE=1
# generated the following test-suite.log
=========================================
   libvirt 3.2.0: tests/test-suite.log
=========================================

# TOTAL: 115
# PASS:  111
# SKIP:  0
# XFAIL: 0
# FAIL:  4
# XPASS: 0
# ERROR: 0

.. contents:: :depth: 2

FAIL: virfirewalltest
=====================

TEST: virfirewalltest
      !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 40  FAIL
FAIL virfirewalltest (exit status: 1)

FAIL: networkxml2firewalltest
=============================

TEST: networkxml2firewalltest
                                         0   FAIL
FAIL networkxml2firewalltest (exit status: 1)

FAIL: nwfilterebiptablestest
============================

TEST: nwfilterebiptablestest
                                         0   FAIL
FAIL nwfilterebiptablestest (exit status: 1)

FAIL: nwfilterxml2firewalltest
==============================

TEST: nwfilterxml2firewalltest
                                         0   FAIL
FAIL nwfilterxml2firewalltest (exit status: 1)



make syntax-check VIR_TEST_EXTENSIVE=1
# I did not paste the result here and I do not understand what it means.
# available upon request

Finally, 
make -C tests valgrind
# generated file was attached. 

It seems most of the valgrind failures were false positives, I can only tell 
by comparing the log file with the examples in the HACKING page. But I 
do not have the knowledge to determine.

Could anyone tell me if I am missing something? Having those test failures
is a problem or not? Which ones can be safely ignored? Is there any easier 
way to avoid the false positives? I am concerned because I also need to 
run the test when I make changes to the code. On the other hand, I would 
also like to learn the right way to do the testing or whatever it takes to make
things right.

I am running linux using vmware Workstation Pro 12 on Windows 10. 
Linux version 4.4.55-1-MANJARO (builduser@manjaro) (gcc version 6.3.1 20170306 (GCC) ) #1 SMP PREEMPT



Dan