On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 14:42:57 +0200
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger(a)de.ibm.com> wrote:
Yes, we should also replace that with
return s390_has_feat(S390_FEAT_GUARDED_STORAGE)
I can fixup my patch or provide a 2nd one.
Consider a fixed up patch acked by me.