Re: [libvirt] [Libvirt][Sheepdog]Sheepdog pool/volume storage driver for libvirt problem
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 3:05 AM, Eric Blake <eblake(a)redhat.com> wrote:
[...]
There's two aspects to storage management in libvirt.
Eric, very thanks for your perfectly answers ;-)
[...]
But without at least one online user (qemu), it
doesn't make sense to worry about offline management in libvirt (what
good is allocating a volume if you can't make any guest populate or read
from that volume). That's why we are telling you to focus on getting
your new protocol accepted into qemu first.
Actually, i also cannot quite understand why we focus on getting new
protocol accepted into qemu first. Could you please expain it clearer?
Thanks in advance ;-)
--
Thanks
Harry Wei