Re: [libvirt] g_error considered harmful
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 07:22:54PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
Hi
In general I agree with the patch series dropping g_error() in favour
of normal GError reporting, so programs can cope with errors.
However, it removes the forced logging and it's too easy for the
caller to ignore them, making it hard to track down when something
goes wrong.
I added a patch to the series to add a g_warn_if_reached when this is
triggered
I think this is even more relevant, because libvirt-glib is logging
*tons* of normal/useless runtime messages
To be honest I didn't really notice that... What kind of useless messages
are you getting ?
Christophe
Attachments:
- attachment.sig (application/pgp-signature — 198 bytes)