On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 04:35:54PM +0100, Erik Skultety wrote:
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 11:00:06AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
Since you edited the template you referenced ^above, you added the whole thing
which I'm not sure is really necessary. There's also some leftover star object.
Yeah, I was not 100% sure whether it was a good idea to trim all the extra
layers off or not, but as you say, it does make a big template file. So
minimising it makes sense.
I think that we can keep the SVG as small as possible (that's
actually the
reason why I created mine from scratch) an only incorporate what we absolutely
need, like the shape itself and measurements, so that we can export it to PDF
(I've heard that printing services actually prefer PDF). Also, I noticed that
you "went by eye" with placing the logo, I've got patches to mitigate this,
so
we should be then able to use proper alignment.
Yeah, I did it by eye :-) Did you think it needs tweaking more ?
The spec doesn't specify the thickness of the border, I measure
4.17 here, I
received another template which also a few projects follow with the border
sized at 3.26 (not that I would care that much), the bleed area is the same
1.5mm in both cases.
Yeah, I just followed the border size that the template showed, but it does
feel perhaps too heavy, even hiding the bleed. We could thin it out some
more perhaps.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|:
https://berrange.com -o-
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|:
https://libvirt.org -o-
https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|:
https://entangle-photo.org -o-
https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|