On 11/30/2011 02:26 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:

At 11/30/2011 01:57 PM, ajia@redhat.com Write:

From: Alex Jia <ajia@redhat.com>

Detected by Coverity. Leak introduced in commit 673adba.

Signed-off-by: Alex Jia <ajia@redhat.com>
---
 src/rpc/virnetclient.c |    1 +
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/rpc/virnetclient.c b/src/rpc/virnetclient.c
index a738129..9ed03a5 100644
--- a/src/rpc/virnetclient.c
+++ b/src/rpc/virnetclient.c
@@ -1740,6 +1740,7 @@ cleanup:
 
 unlock:
     virNetClientUnlock(client);
+    VIR_FREE(call);

According to the comment:
/* If partially sent, then the call is still on the dispatch queue */

So I think we should not free call if it is still on the queue.

Yeah, it's a inappropriate place, in addition, in 'cleanup' label, if ret !=1, also will free 'all', then 'unlock' label still do this, the following should be a right place:

1708     if (!client->sock || client->wantClose) {
1709         virNetError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR, "%s",
1710                     _("client socket is closed"));
1711       VIR_FREE(call);
1712         goto unlock;
1713     }

Thanks,
Alex

Thanks
Wen Congyang

     return ret;
 }