8 Apr
2014
8 Apr
'14
11:28 a.m.
I wanted to back-port 736e017e as requested in Bug 1058149 [1], because it fixes a crash. However, it requires 5b3492fa and e9d09fe1 to be back-ported as well, so I wanted to confirm it's still OK when it's not a simple two-liner or similar (and combined with the low probability of the crash to happen). What's the stand on this? Martin [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058149