Re: [libvirt] New Libvirt Implementation - OpenNebula

Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 05:04:50PM +0100, Stefan de Konink wrote: >> Last time *your* argument was that the API would get too big. Now why >> isn't that argument valid anymore? I'm honestly asking for an >> explanation on this point, and I do expect you have it. > > You are confusing internal API with external API. The external API has > scalability issues because it is a long term supported ABI. The internal > API size is irrelevant because we can & will change that at will. The > domain XML handling API is internal only for in-tree drivers. So there > has been no change in policy wrt to the external API Is an external tool able to use the internal XML handling (from a C perspective?) or isn't this code exported to the shared library? Stefan ps. Sorry if you thought I was trying to virtualize a troll. -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list