On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 10:37:51AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 05:21:23PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
This patch changes the way we use linker scripts to have fully versioned symbols, and a versioned private section for symbols needed by libvirtd and virsh.
If you look at the version script below, you'll see that I've added an explicit version section for each version in which we introduced a symbol. Some people at Red Hat have suggested to me offlist that this is overkil, and we could just have one section named 0.5.0 for all our existing symbols, and then just add new sections for each subsequent release.
I kind of like the idea of representing all the releases in which we added symbols, but functionally it doesn't matter which style we pick for our existing symbols. Anyone else have an opinion ?
keeping the log may also help maintaining http://libvirt.org/hvsupport.html so I'm in favor of the full list Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ daniel@veillard.com | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/