On 10/07/2013 10:25 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 10/07/2013 10:09 AM, andreas.fuchs@sit.fraunhofer.de wrote:
[please don't top-post on technical lists, and also fix your mailer to use proper In-Reply-To headers rather than creating a new thread on a reply. Also, line wrapping wouldn't hurt]
I should have been more specific. If e.g. an LC_MESSAGE is set that cannot be found it returns "initialization failed" and nothing more... See the bug report.Spent >1h this morning trying to get some demonstrator running... So I thought rather share it...
Which bug? [/me goes and looks]
Oh, you mean https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016158
Don't make us go on a goose hunt. Post the relevant details directly in your commit message, rather than assuming that everyone else actively follows the bug database and can correlate the two without effort. Just because you spent >1hr hunting down the problem doesn't mean that you should make everyone else likewise spend time because of an incomplete report.
I just re-read what I wrote... Email is a lousy medium for conveying emotion. I apologize for sounding a bit too harsh, and want to thank you for taking the time to report an issue. More importantly, thanks for posting a patch! Too many people report issues without any further effort. Even if we end up going with a slightly different patch, the fact that you showed initiative is a positive thing, and I was wrong for forgetting to express appreciation, with a net result of conveying the wrong tone in my first reply. Please continue to contribute, and don't use my (poor) behavior as an excuse to run away. -- Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org