Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] storage: return -1 when fs pool can't be mounted

On 11.07.2013 12:43, Ján Tomko wrote: > Don't reuse the return value of virStorageBackendFileSystemIsMounted. > If it's 0, we'd return it even if the mount command failed. > > Also, don't report another error if it's -1, since one has already > been reported. > > Introduced by 258e06c. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981251 > --- > src/storage/storage_backend_fs.c | 11 +++++++---- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > ACK Michal