On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 10:11:15AM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 1/23/19 5:24 PM, Erik Skultety wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 04:45:07PM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
This partially reverts 00dc991ca167302c7a72f4fb16be061d05b12a32.
2,030 (1,456 direct, 574 indirect) bytes in 14 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 77 of 80 at 0x4C30E96: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711) by 0x50F83AA: virAlloc (viralloc.c:143) by 0x5178DFA: virPCIDeviceNew (virpci.c:1753) by 0x51753E9: virPCIDeviceIterDevices (virpci.c:468) by 0x5175EB5: virPCIDeviceGetParent (virpci.c:759) by 0x517AB55: virPCIDeviceIsBehindSwitchLackingACS (virpci.c:2476) by 0x517AC24: virPCIDeviceIsAssignable (virpci.c:2494) by 0x10BF27: testVirPCIDeviceIsAssignable (virpcitest.c:229) by 0x10D14C: virTestRun (testutils.c:174) by 0x10C535: mymain (virpcitest.c:422) by 0x10F1B6: virTestMain (testutils.c:1112) by 0x10CF93: main (virpcitest.c:455)
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com> --- src/util/virpci.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/util/virpci.c b/src/util/virpci.c index ef578bf774..fb22460bf5 100644 --- a/src/util/virpci.c +++ b/src/util/virpci.c @@ -482,6 +482,8 @@ virPCIDeviceIterDevices(virPCIDeviceIterPredicate predicate, *matched = check;
I think that instead of adding a new condition block, we could do VIR_STEAL_PTR ^here and then...
ret = 1; break; + } else { + virPCIDeviceFree(check); }
do virPCIDeviceFree(check) unconditionally. IMHO it would also look more clean.
Or, even better, @check can be declared as VIR_AUTOPTR(virPCIDevice), VIR_STREAL_PTR can be used to set @matched and then all virPCIDeviceFree() calls can be removed. Does this work for you?
Sure, go ahead, you already have my RB :). Erik