On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 02:01:57PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 08:57:25AM -0400, Hugh O. Brock wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 11:50:20AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 11:38:06AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 12:35:32PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> > > > On 06/22/2010 12:24 PM, Hugh O. Brock wrote:
> > > > >> Correct, we shouldn't change this behaviour - it'll
break apps parsing
> > > > >> the output
> > > > >
> > > > > FWIW Rich Jones complains that the output as it stands is nigh
on
> > > > > unparseable anyway. Perhaps we should consider that a bug, and
fix
> > > > > it...
> > > >
> > > > The new --details option is our chance to change output - it outputs
> > > > whatever format we want, because it is a new flag; Rich, do you have
any
> > > > preferences about what it _should_ output?
> > > >
> > > > Here's what pool-list --details would currently do, if we
applied
> > > > Justin's patch as-is (modulo no line wrapping added by my email
client):
> > >
> > > Sorry, been away for a couple of weeks.
> > >
> > > > virsh # pool-list --details --all
> > > > Name State Autostart Persistent Capacity Allocation
Available
> > > >
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > default running yes yes 1.79 TB 1.49 TB
304.77 GB
> > > > image_dir running yes yes 1.79 TB 1.49 TB
304.77 GB
> > > > tmp inactive no yes - -
-
> > >
> > > One good thing, and several bad things about that. The good thing is
> > > that empty columns are presented with '-' which means you can use
awk
> > > and sort -k to parse the output columnwise.
> > >
> > > The bad things:
> > >
> > > * Space within fields "1.79 TB" (awk / sort -k in fact
_won't_ work).
> > >
> > > * Numeric fields aren't numbers: You can't sort -n on "1.79
TB", and
> > > you can't read that number into a script and do math on it. Most
> > > tools have a "-h" or "--human" option in order to
generate human-
> > > readable numbers (without spaces), but default to just printing the
> > > raw numbers.
> > >
> > > * Unnecessary "-------" line.
> > >
> > > * Title line should be optional. Have a --no-title option or
> > > something like that to suppress it.
> > >
> > > * Does virsh still print an unnecessary blank line after the output?
> > > If so, stop doing that.
> >
> > All of these bad things are just an artifact of trying to use the same
> > output format for humans & machines. To address all those would make
> > the result unpleasant for humans. We really do just need to create a
> > dedicated format for machines, csv or json, or somethingelse and leave
> > the human format alone
>
> Actually I think we *do* need the --details convenience method for
> human-readable output, *and* a better machine-parseable format. Justin
> is mostly interested in making virsh more usable for people, which I
> fully support -- making it easier to script is also a bonus however.
Err, that's entirely my point
Oh, excellent!
:)
--Hugh
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list