On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 12:00:59PM +0000, qiaonuohan@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
On 03/04/2014 07:41 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
diff --git a/src/test/test_driver.c b/src/test/test_driver.c index b724f82..605b0d1 100644 --- a/src/test/test_driver.c +++ b/src/test/test_driver.c @@ -2427,9 +2427,10 @@ testDomainRestore(virConnectPtr conn, return testDomainRestoreFlags(conn, path, NULL, 0); }
-static int testDomainCoreDump(virDomainPtr domain, - const char *to, - unsigned int flags) +static int testDomainCoreDumpWithFormat(virDomainPtr domain, + const char *to, + unsigned int dumpformat, + unsigned int flags) { testConnPtr privconn = domain->conn->privateData; int fd = -1; @@ -2479,6 +2480,12 @@ static int testDomainCoreDump(virDomainPtr domain, } }
+ if (dumpformat> VIR_DUMP_FORMAT_KDUMP_SNAPPY) { + virReportSystemError(errno, + _("invalid value of dumpformat: %d"), dumpformat); + goto cleanup; + }
This should be done in the libvirt.c entry point, comparing against VIR_DUMP_FORMAT_LAST
Is it OK, if I change the check to following one
+ /* dump the core of "domain" to file "to" */ + if (virDomainCoreDumpWithFormat(domain, to, dumpformat, flags) < 0) { + goto cleanup; + }
Huh, I don't really see what you mean here. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|