On 09/18/2014 10:55 AM, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
On 09/18/2014 06:48 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 09/18/2014 10:44 AM, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
>
>>> Ouch. This will make our testsuite differ based on whether it is
>>> run on
>>> Linux in FIPS mode (where FIPS might exist) or on any other setup. I
>>> think you need to hoist the check for virFileExists() to the caller,
>>> and
>>> pass in the result as a new bool parameter to this function, so that
>>> the
>>> testsuite has full control over the boolean without regards to the
>>> current system's level of FIPS support.
>>>
>>
>> Sigh, that's right. I've completely forget about the tests. And that
>> reminds me whether we should also revert the test for enable-fips as it
>> seems to be pointless?
>
> It's still worth testing that we can add or avoid '-enable-fips' in the
> generated command line according to the boolean value we pass in.
>
Yes I agree and that's why I would like to remove the test from
qemucapabilitiestest and create a new one in qemuxml2argvtest.
Yes, that makes sense.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library
http://libvirt.org