 
            
            
            
            
                28 Apr
                
                    2012
                
            
            
                28 Apr
                
                '12
                
            
            
            
        
    
                11:06 a.m.
            
        On 28.04.2012 10:22, Osier Yang wrote:
It doesn't break out the "for" loop even if duplicate pool is found, and thus the "matchpool" could be overriden as NULL again if there is different pool afterwards.
To address the problem in libvirt-user list:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/2012-April/msg00150.html --- src/conf/storage_conf.c | 3 +++ 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
ACK Michal