
On 08/17/2018 08:38 PM, John Ferlan wrote:
On 08/14/2018 07:19 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
Fortunately, we have qemu wrappers so it's sufficient to put lock/unlock call only there.
Kind of sparse... Maybe a few words related to what benefit locking the metadata provides. There is a danger in all this too if the unlock does fail since metadata locks are wait type locks any subsequent lock will wait.
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com> --- src/qemu/qemu_security.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 107 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_security.c b/src/qemu/qemu_security.c index af3be42854..527563947c 100644 --- a/src/qemu/qemu_security.c +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_security.c @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ #include "qemu_domain.h" #include "qemu_security.h" #include "virlog.h" +#include "locking/domain_lock.h"
#define VIR_FROM_THIS VIR_FROM_QEMU
@@ -39,6 +40,12 @@ qemuSecuritySetAllLabel(virQEMUDriverPtr driver, { int ret = -1; qemuDomainObjPrivatePtr priv = vm->privateData; + bool locked = false; + + if (virDomainLockMetadataLock(driver->lockManager, vm) < 0) + goto cleanup; + + locked = true;
if (qemuDomainNamespaceEnabled(vm, QEMU_DOMAIN_NS_MOUNT) && virSecurityManagerTransactionStart(driver->securityManager) < 0) @@ -55,9 +62,17 @@ qemuSecuritySetAllLabel(virQEMUDriverPtr driver, vm->pid) < 0) goto cleanup;
+ locked = false;
Technically not true yet. Also , I think two such attempts with the second eliciting the VIR_WARN is perfectly reasonable (IOW: on failure of the following goto cleanup with locked == true, try again, and spew that message).
This repeats a few times, but I'll note just once.
I don't think it is safe to unlock something twice if we've locked it just once.
+ + if (virDomainLockMetadataUnlock(driver->lockManager, vm) < 0) + goto cleanup; + ret = 0; cleanup: virSecurityManagerTransactionAbort(driver->securityManager); + if (locked && + virDomainLockMetadataUnlock(driver->lockManager, vm) < 0) + VIR_WARN("unable to release metadata lock");
Should we add the @stdin_path and @vm->pid and/or vm->name here? It may help some day. Similar comments for other new VIR_WARN's, but the parameters change...
Ah, good point. Okay.
return ret; }
@@ -68,6 +83,10 @@ qemuSecurityRestoreAllLabel(virQEMUDriverPtr driver, bool migrated) { qemuDomainObjPrivatePtr priv = vm->privateData; + bool unlock = true; + + if (virDomainLockMetadataLock(driver->lockManager, vm) < 0) + unlock = false;
/* In contrast to qemuSecuritySetAllLabel, do not use * secdriver transactions here. This function is called from @@ -79,6 +98,10 @@ qemuSecurityRestoreAllLabel(virQEMUDriverPtr driver, vm->def, migrated, priv->chardevStdioLogd); + + if (unlock && + virDomainLockMetadataUnlock(driver->lockManager, vm) < 0) + VIR_WARN("unable to release metadata lock"); }
@@ -88,6 +111,12 @@ qemuSecuritySetDiskLabel(virQEMUDriverPtr driver, virDomainDiskDefPtr disk) { int ret = -1; + bool locked = false; + + if (virDomainLockMetadataDiskLock(driver->lockManager, vm, disk) < 0) + goto cleanup; + + locked = true;
if (qemuDomainNamespaceEnabled(vm, QEMU_DOMAIN_NS_MOUNT) && virSecurityManagerTransactionStart(driver->securityManager) < 0) @@ -103,9 +132,17 @@ qemuSecuritySetDiskLabel(virQEMUDriverPtr driver, vm->pid) < 0) goto cleanup;
+ locked = false; + + if (virDomainLockMetadataDiskUnlock(driver->lockManager, vm, disk) < 0) + goto cleanup; + ret = 0; cleanup: virSecurityManagerTransactionAbort(driver->securityManager); + if (locked && + virDomainLockMetadataDiskUnlock(driver->lockManager, vm, disk) < 0) + VIR_WARN("unable to release disk metadata lock"); return ret; }
@@ -116,6 +153,12 @@ qemuSecurityRestoreDiskLabel(virQEMUDriverPtr driver, virDomainDiskDefPtr disk) { int ret = -1; + bool locked = false; + + if (virDomainLockMetadataDiskLock(driver->lockManager, vm, disk) < 0) + goto cleanup; + + locked = true;
if (qemuDomainNamespaceEnabled(vm, QEMU_DOMAIN_NS_MOUNT) && virSecurityManagerTransactionStart(driver->securityManager) < 0) @@ -131,9 +174,17 @@ qemuSecurityRestoreDiskLabel(virQEMUDriverPtr driver, vm->pid) < 0) goto cleanup;
+ locked = false; + + if (virDomainLockMetadataDiskUnlock(driver->lockManager, vm, disk) < 0) + goto cleanup; + ret = 0; cleanup: virSecurityManagerTransactionAbort(driver->securityManager); + if (locked && + virDomainLockMetadataDiskUnlock(driver->lockManager, vm, disk) < 0) + VIR_WARN("unable to release disk metadata lock"); return ret; }
@@ -144,6 +195,12 @@ qemuSecuritySetImageLabel(virQEMUDriverPtr driver, virStorageSourcePtr src) { int ret = -1; + bool locked = false; + + if (virDomainLockMetadataImageLock(driver->lockManager, vm, src) < 0) + goto cleanup; + + locked = true;
if (qemuDomainNamespaceEnabled(vm, QEMU_DOMAIN_NS_MOUNT) && virSecurityManagerTransactionStart(driver->securityManager) < 0) @@ -159,9 +216,17 @@ qemuSecuritySetImageLabel(virQEMUDriverPtr driver, vm->pid) < 0) goto cleanup;
+ locked = false; + + if (virDomainLockMetadataImageUnlock(driver->lockManager, vm, src) < 0) + goto cleanup; + ret = 0; cleanup: virSecurityManagerTransactionAbort(driver->securityManager); + if (locked && + virDomainLockMetadataImageUnlock(driver->lockManager, vm, src) < 0) + VIR_WARN("unable to release image metadata lock"); return ret; }
@@ -172,6 +237,12 @@ qemuSecurityRestoreImageLabel(virQEMUDriverPtr driver, virStorageSourcePtr src) { int ret = -1; + bool locked = false; + + if (virDomainLockMetadataImageLock(driver->lockManager, vm, src) < 0) + goto cleanup; + + locked = true;
if (qemuDomainNamespaceEnabled(vm, QEMU_DOMAIN_NS_MOUNT) && virSecurityManagerTransactionStart(driver->securityManager) < 0) @@ -187,9 +258,17 @@ qemuSecurityRestoreImageLabel(virQEMUDriverPtr driver, vm->pid) < 0) goto cleanup;
+ locked = false; + + if (virDomainLockMetadataImageUnlock(driver->lockManager, vm, src) < 0) + goto cleanup; + ret = 0; cleanup: virSecurityManagerTransactionAbort(driver->securityManager); + if (locked && + virDomainLockMetadataImageUnlock(driver->lockManager, vm, src) < 0) + VIR_WARN("unable to release image metadata lock"); return ret; }
Just below here is HostdevLabel processing... For a SCSI host device that would seem to cover the type of resource described in the cover letter to patch6 - at least for iSCSI LUNs (and of course vHBA LUNs).
Need to look at the hostdev->mode and hostdev->source.subsys.type and dig into the subsys.u.scsi to get to the src->path.
Oh, this was the reason I made VIR_WARN() so sparse. I did not wanted to get into business of getting paths from all the complicated structs we have. I'll just put vm->def->name and vm->pid into the warn message. Michal