Re: [libvirt] Back and suggested release schedule
On 23/12/2010, at 12:11 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:31:14PM +1100, Justin Clift wrote:
> On 22/12/2010, at 10:30 PM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
>> Also on the release name, should we go 0.9.0 considering the refactorings
>> (i.e. indicating future patches will be harder to apply to earlier branches)
>> or stick to 0.8.7 (considering that there isn't major feature improvement
>> ... unless I missed them !),
>
> My initial thinking is 0.8.7, but I don't feel strongly about it. :)
>
> With the "freeze", what's a good process to put in place while frozen
to
> make sure only bugs and doc improvements go in?
Well that should be part of the review process and people who have commit
rights are supposed to know the rules ;-)
Heh, sure. Is that approach really working in reality though (recently anyway)? :)
I'm thinking... not so much.