On 23/12/2010, at 12:11 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:31:14PM +1100, Justin Clift wrote:
On 22/12/2010, at 10:30 PM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
Also on the release name, should we go 0.9.0 considering the refactorings (i.e. indicating future patches will be harder to apply to earlier branches) or stick to 0.8.7 (considering that there isn't major feature improvement ... unless I missed them !),
My initial thinking is 0.8.7, but I don't feel strongly about it. :)
With the "freeze", what's a good process to put in place while frozen to make sure only bugs and doc improvements go in?
Well that should be part of the review process and people who have commit rights are supposed to know the rules ;-)
Heh, sure. Is that approach really working in reality though (recently anyway)? :) I'm thinking... not so much.