Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 1/2] uml: Avoid resource leak of event in umlInofityEvent
On 01/22/13 17:20, Eric Blake wrote:
On 01/22/2013 08:23 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On 01/22/13 15:20, John Ferlan wrote:
>> If there was more than one inotify_event found in the read/while loop,
>> then only the last event found would have been queued.
>> ---
>> src/uml/uml_driver.c | 6 ++++--
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>
> ACK.
Pushed.
Uhm, I was just going to do that, but the build test was finishing.
Peter