On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 08:00:01PM +0100, Paul Jenner wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-02 at 21:46 -0400, Chris Lalancette wrote:
<snip>
> @@ -8288,6 +8731,14 @@ static const vshCmdDef commands[] = {
> {"vcpupin", cmdVcpupin, opts_vcpupin, info_vcpupin},
> {"version", cmdVersion, NULL, info_version},
> {"vncdisplay", cmdVNCDisplay, opts_vncdisplay, info_vncdisplay},
> +
> + {"snapshot-create", cmdSnapshotCreate, opts_snapshot_create,
info_snapshot_create},
> + {"snapshot-current", cmdSnapshotCurrent, opts_snapshot_current,
info_snapshot_current},
> + {"snapshot-delete", cmdSnapshotDelete, opts_snapshot_delete,
info_snapshot_delete},
> + {"snapshot-dumpxml", cmdSnapshotDumpXML, opts_snapshot_dumpxml,
info_snapshot_dumpxml},
> + {"snapshot-list", cmdSnapshotList, opts_snapshot_list,
info_snapshot_list},
> + {"revert-to-snapshot", cmdDomainRevertToSnapshot,
opts_revert_to_snapshot, info_revert_to_snapshot},
> +
> {NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL}
> };
All the new virsh commands for snapshot management follow the convention
of snapshot- prefix (like similar pool-, vol-, net- command prefixes)
except for revert-to-snapshot. From a virsh usability perspective, would
it make sense to rename this command snapshot-revert? I appreciate that
does not capture what the command does as well as revert-to-snapshot but
I think this may be a reasonable trade-off for usability and users
finding the command easily.
I agree, this should be called snapshot-revert
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o-
http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org -o-
http://deltacloud.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|