On 16/09/16 14:19, Ján Tomko wrote:
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 12:50:38PM +0200, Erik Skultety wrote:
Signed-off-by: Erik Skultety <eskultet@redhat.com> --- tools/vsh.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Is there a use-case for a command without info?
I think all the commands should have a description and we should enforce that in the test suite.
Well, if I call vshCmddefCheckInternals from the self-test as suggested by 4/8, then we could also go your suggested way here as well. I fixed the rest and will push it in a while. I'll send an updated version of this later. Thanks, Erik
diff --git a/tools/vsh.c b/tools/vsh.c index 4ee472c..3772d92 100644 --- a/tools/vsh.c +++ b/tools/vsh.c @@ -695,7 +695,7 @@ vshCmddefHelp(vshControl *ctl, const char *cmdname) } fputc('\n', stdout);
- if (desc[0]) { + if (desc && *desc) {
Or maybe report an error here if the description is missing?
Jan
/* Print the description only if it's not empty. */ fputs(_("\n DESCRIPTION\n"), stdout); fprintf(stdout, " %s\n", _(desc)); -- 2.5.5
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list