On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 1:25 AM Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> wrote:
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
---
 include/qapi/qmp/dispatch.h | 1 -
 monitor/misc.c              | 3 +--
 scripts/qapi/commands.py    | 5 +----
 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/qapi/qmp/dispatch.h b/include/qapi/qmp/dispatch.h
index 075203dc67..0ce88200b9 100644
--- a/include/qapi/qmp/dispatch.h
+++ b/include/qapi/qmp/dispatch.h
@@ -21,7 +21,6 @@ typedef void (QmpCommandFunc)(QDict *, QObject **, Error **);

 typedef enum QmpCommandOptions
 {
-    QCO_NO_OPTIONS            =  0x0,
     QCO_NO_SUCCESS_RESP       =  (1U << 0),
     QCO_ALLOW_OOB             =  (1U << 1),
     QCO_ALLOW_PRECONFIG       =  (1U << 2),
diff --git a/monitor/misc.c b/monitor/misc.c
index ffe7966870..3556b177f6 100644
--- a/monitor/misc.c
+++ b/monitor/misc.c
@@ -230,8 +230,7 @@ static void monitor_init_qmp_commands(void)

     qmp_init_marshal(&qmp_commands);

-    qmp_register_command(&qmp_commands, "device_add", qmp_device_add,
-                         QCO_NO_OPTIONS);
+    qmp_register_command(&qmp_commands, "device_add", qmp_device_add, 0);

     QTAILQ_INIT(&qmp_cap_negotiation_commands);
     qmp_register_command(&qmp_cap_negotiation_commands, "qmp_capabilities",
diff --git a/scripts/qapi/commands.py b/scripts/qapi/commands.py
index 3654825968..c8a975528f 100644
--- a/scripts/qapi/commands.py
+++ b/scripts/qapi/commands.py
@@ -229,15 +229,12 @@ def gen_register_command(name: str,
     if coroutine:
         options += ['QCO_COROUTINE']

-    if not options:
-        options = ['QCO_NO_OPTIONS']
-
     ret = mcgen('''
     qmp_register_command(cmds, "%(name)s",
                          qmp_marshal_%(c_name)s, %(opts)s);
 ''',
                 name=name, c_name=c_name(name),
-                opts=" | ".join(options))
+                opts=' | '.join(options) or 0)
     return ret



I'm not a big fan of naked constants on the C side, but the generator simplification is nice. I suppose it's worth the trade-off if you like it better this way.

"eh".

Reviewed-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>